स्वास्थ्य और फिटनेस

How Ideal Body Weight Is Calculated

How ideal body weight is estimated using the Devine, Robinson, Miller, and Hamwi formulas, with worked examples, verification, and BMI healthy range comparison.

Verified against Devine BJ (1974) - Gentamicin therapy. Drug Intell Clin Pharm 8:650-655 on 15 Feb 2026 Updated 15 February 2026 4 min read
कैलकुलेटर खोलें
Translated article · View in English

सारांश

Ideal body weight (IBW) is a clinical estimate of a person’s target weight based on height and sex. Four formulas are widely used - Devine (1974), Robinson (1983), Miller (1983), and Hamwi (1964) - each producing a single point estimate. All four were originally designed for drug dosing calculations, not as health or fitness targets, though they are commonly used as general reference points.

Because no single formula is authoritative, this calculator shows all four side by side, along with the BMI healthy weight range (18.5–24.9) as a modern clinical comparison.

यह कैसे काम करता है

All four formulas share the same structure: a base weight at 5 feet (152.4 cm / 60 inches), plus an increment per inch of height above 5 feet. The formulas are sex-specific - males and females have different base weights and per-inch increments.

The formulas differ because they were derived from different source data:

  • Devine - empirical estimates for gentamicin dosing; no formal derivation from height-weight data
  • Robinson - regression on the 1959 Metropolitan Life Insurance height-weight tables
  • Miller - regression on the 1983 Metropolitan Life Insurance height-weight tables
  • Hamwi - quick clinical estimate for diabetes management

Despite their drug-dosing origins, these formulas remain the most-referenced IBW equations in clinical practice (Pai & Paloucek, 2000).

The formulas

All formulas use inches_over_5ft = (height_cm − 152.4) / 2.54.

Devine (1974)

Male: IBW = 50.0 + 2.3 × inches_over_5ft

Where

50.0= Base weight (kg) at 5 feet for males
2.3= Additional kg per inch above 5 feet
Female: IBW = 45.5 + 2.3 × inches_over_5ft

Where

45.5= Base weight (kg) at 5 feet for females
2.3= Additional kg per inch above 5 feet (same as males)

Robinson (1983)

Male: IBW = 52 + 1.9 × inches_over_5ft

Where

52= Base weight (kg) at 5 feet for males
1.9= Additional kg per inch above 5 feet
Female: IBW = 49 + 1.7 × inches_over_5ft

Where

49= Base weight (kg) at 5 feet for females
1.7= Additional kg per inch above 5 feet

Miller (1983)

Male: IBW = 56.2 + 1.41 × inches_over_5ft

Where

56.2= Base weight (kg) at 5 feet for males
1.41= Additional kg per inch above 5 feet
Female: IBW = 53.1 + 1.36 × inches_over_5ft

Where

53.1= Base weight (kg) at 5 feet for females
1.36= Additional kg per inch above 5 feet

Hamwi (1964)

Male: IBW = 48.0 + 2.7 × inches_over_5ft

Where

48.0= Base weight (kg) at 5 feet for males (≈ 106 lbs)
2.7= Additional kg per inch above 5 feet (≈ 6 lbs)
Female: IBW = 45.5 + 2.2 × inches_over_5ft

Where

45.5= Base weight (kg) at 5 feet for females (≈ 100 lbs)
2.2= Additional kg per inch above 5 feet (≈ 5 lbs)

The Hamwi formula was originally defined in imperial units (106 + 6 lbs/inch for males, 100 + 5 lbs/inch for females). The metric coefficients above are the standard conversions used across reference calculators.

BMI healthy weight range

Healthy range = 18.5 × height_m² to 24.9 × height_m²

Where

18.5= Lower bound of WHO healthy BMI range
24.9= Upper bound of WHO healthy BMI range
height_m= Height in metres

Worked examples

Male, 5’10” (177.8 cm)

Male, 177.8 cm (5 ft 10 in)

1

Convert to inches over 5 feet

(177.8 − 152.4) / 2.54 = 10.0 inches

= 10.0

2

Devine

50.0 + 2.3 × 10.0

= 73.0 kg

3

Robinson

52.0 + 1.9 × 10.0

= 71.0 kg

4

Miller

56.2 + 1.41 × 10.0

= 70.3 kg

5

Hamwi

48.0 + 2.7 × 10.0

= 75.0 kg

Result

Range: 70.3 – 75.0 kg, average 72.3 kg

Female, 5’5” (165.1 cm)

Female, 165.1 cm (5 ft 5 in)

1

Convert to inches over 5 feet

(165.1 − 152.4) / 2.54 = 5.0 inches

= 5.0

2

Devine

45.5 + 2.3 × 5.0

= 57.0 kg

3

Robinson

49.0 + 1.7 × 5.0

= 57.5 kg

4

Miller

53.1 + 1.36 × 5.0

= 59.9 kg

5

Hamwi

45.5 + 2.2 × 5.0

= 56.5 kg

Result

Range: 56.5 – 59.9 kg, average 57.7 kg

इनपुट की व्याख्या

  • Height - in centimetres or inches. All formulas convert height to inches internally and measure the difference from a 5-foot baseline.
  • Sex - required because all four formulas use different coefficients for males and females. These are based on biological sex, not gender, as the original studies used physiological data.
  • Units - toggle between metric (cm/kg) and imperial (inches/lbs) display.

आउटपुट की व्याख्या

  • Ideal weight range - the spread across all four formulas, from lowest to highest. This is the primary result.
  • Average - the arithmetic mean of the four formula results.
  • Formula comparison chart - visual bar chart showing each formula’s estimate.
  • BMI healthy range - the weight range that gives a BMI of 18.5–24.9 at your height. Shown alongside the formula range for comparison.
  • Formula table - detailed table showing each formula’s name, year, original purpose, and calculated weight.

धारणाएं और सीमाएं

  • Drug dosing origins. All four formulas were designed for pharmaceutical calculations, not as health or fitness targets. The BMI healthy range (18.5–24.9) is generally preferred by modern clinical guidelines as a weight target.
  • Height ≥ 152.4 cm only. The formulas use 5 feet (152.4 cm) as a baseline. For heights below this, the calculator returns the base weight (no negative increments). The formulas were not validated for shorter individuals.
  • No frame size adjustment. The Hamwi formula originally included ±10% adjustments for small/large body frames, but these are rarely used in modern practice and are not included.
  • Population averages, not personalised. These formulas don’t account for muscle mass, bone density, body composition, or ethnicity. A muscular athlete’s ideal weight may be well above these estimates.
  • Formula divergence grows with height. At 6’2”, the spread between Miller and Hamwi is nearly 10 kg. At 5’5” female, the spread is only 3.4 kg.
  • The Devine formula lacks a formal scientific derivation (Pai & Paloucek, 2000). Despite this, it remains the most widely used IBW equation in clinical pharmacy.

सत्यापन

Test caseFormulaExpectedOur resultSource
Male, 5’10” (177.8 cm)Devine73.0 kg73.0 kgcalculator.net
Male, 5’10” (177.8 cm)Robinson71.0 kg71.0 kgcalculator.net
Male, 5’10” (177.8 cm)Miller70.3 kg70.3 kgcalculator.net
Male, 5’10” (177.8 cm)Hamwi75.0 kg75.0 kgcalculator.net
Female, 5’5” (165.1 cm)Devine57.0 kg57.0 kgcalculator.net
Female, 5’5” (165.1 cm)Robinson57.5 kg57.5 kgcalculator.net
Female, 5’5” (165.1 cm)Miller59.9 kg59.9 kgcalculator.net
Female, 5’5” (165.1 cm)Hamwi56.5 kg56.5 kgcalculator.net
Male, 6’2” (187.96 cm)Devine82.2 kg82.2 kgcalculator.net
Male, 6’2” (187.96 cm)Robinson78.6 kg78.6 kgcalculator.net
Male, 6’2” (187.96 cm)Miller75.94 kg75.94 kgcalculator.net
Male, 6’2” (187.96 cm)Hamwi85.8 kg85.8 kgcalculator.net

All values verified against calculator.net (accessed 2026-02-15) and confirmed by manual calculation from published coefficients.

स्रोत

ideal-weight ibw devine robinson miller hamwi bmi